Businesses should classify data not IT
Currently what we see is that tools and technology limitations are used as a basis for classifying data, and even worse is that the classification is in itself incorrect. The so-called big data is so wrongly named. I have already explained why the naming is incorrect in another article - Why big data is actually small? Wouldn't it be much simpler, better, more meaningful and a standardized approach to classify data into primary and secondary data instead of using misnamed, meaningless and non-standard terms such as small data and big data? Primary data is the essential or core data without which the business cannot function. For example, a purchase transaction in a retail store has to be captured and stored for billing, payment, compliance, etc. These are mandatory requirements. Business Intelligence (BI) on top of that data is not mandatory but very useful, but that is not the main purpose of storing that core data in the first place. Secondary data is all of that da...